| If industry productivity experts and
theorists are correct, out-sourcing ought to be sweeping the travel
industry as the latest and greatest key to enhanced productivity and
lower costs.
Fortunately, the movement toward outsourcing is slower. Usually, this
is because the theorists have not figured out how to do it, not a result
of their loss of confidence in the principle.
It’s time the travel industry took a serious look at precisely what
is gained by outsourcing, as well as what is lost.
"Outsourcing" means to acquire from an external supplier
basic business products or services that otherwise might be produced
internally. This is done to improve quality or timeliness or, more
commonly, to lower costs.
Travel outsourcing has a long and successful history, ranging from
services that have routinely been outsourced for years, such as 24-hour
help services, to travel products themselves, such as vacation packages,
which are, in a sense, outsourced from agency to wholesaler.
Recently, outsourcing has taken a much higher profile in the travel
industry, as a few very large companies and some midsize ones start
outsourcing major components of their operations and essential services.
A good example is reservations. Hotels, airlines and, recently, agents
have outsourced reservations to vast "factories" where teams
of reservationists sit before CRTs and take bookings.
The reason for doing this is clear: A scripted process allows workers
who may lack traditional travel skills but possess others, such as sales
ability, to handle more calls per hour in low-wage markets.
A closer look, however, reveals that some substantial elements are
compromised. Changing the skill base of the reservationist means that
many of the things customers value no longer can be delivered. The
efficiency and sales skills that are important to the supplier become
paramount.
For agencies, the problem is worse: Most agencies did not build local
branches because they wanted to but because the customer required it. In
a competitive industry, it is challenging and risky to tell the customer
what is best.
Outsourcing is offered as a solution to the high investment cost of
the technology required to improve productivity. There are clear
examples of where this has and has not been true.
Clearly, outsourcing many parts of the travel business has been
successful for both principals and their customers, the best example
being 24-hour emergency services and complex airline itinerary pricing,
where outsourced services can be offered that most agencies never could
replicate.
Outsourcing technology service has been far more uneven. When it
comes to technology, most travel companies want to outsource some things
that must never be outsourced, such as planning or integration. One
cannot expect outsourcing to deliver where expectations are unrealistic.
Travel outsourcing can bring important benefits to travel suppliers
and agents, but realizing these benefits demands careful, ongoing
planning, diligent oversight and more than a little skepticism. |