| Every once in a while the travel industry
goes through an air fare "cleansing period," wherein the
complexity of ticket pricing become too much to handle and one airline
or another will try something else. The effects are usually
short-term, although agents occasionally start thinking that these
pricing events somehow benefit or hurt them--even though this has never
been so in the past.
In 1993, when others were saying that the current round of
"simplification" was in full flower, I wrote this piece
describing why it wasn't working and predicting that it wouldn't
last. I was proven right a few months later.
Remember, you heard it here first.
Amidst an industry facing unprecedented pricing turmoil, it’s easy
to forget that all this grief started because some of the largest
airlines decided to "simplify" their fares.
Eliminating a complex fare structure, it was reasoned, lowered
everyone’s transaction costs and gave the public what it wanted —
rational pricing.
Negotiated fares disappeared and yield management (which operates
largely through the mechanism of capacity controls) was said to be on
the way out, too.
It’s also easy to forget that some unfortunate agents believed that
so-called simpler fares would boost their own productivity.
Because "simpler" fares also meant lower fares, I
personally found it hard to understand why agents would be in favor of
lower fares and consequently lower commissions.
An even more interesting part of this picture is that no one has
really benefited.
In the very short term, the traveling public has taken advantage of
unrealistic and unsustainable airfares, but the long-term effects upon
airline pricing have yet to be seen.
Weakest airlines will get still weaker; some may disappear. Travel
agencies are likewise decimated, resulting iii widespread job loss and
business disruption as their owners attempt to survive both a weak
economy and irrational pricing.
Further, "simplification" is largely illusionary. Capacity
controls are still in place, and finding the prices the public expects
is still difficult and time-consuming.
USTravel operates a complex automated data management and fare audit
system known as Maestro (many other large agencies have similar systems
— I illustrate using Maestro because these data are available to me.)
Maestro continually examines reservations booked by USTravel’s
nationwide operation and records detailed and complex statistics about
each reservation.
Among its many functions, Maestro examines thousands of reservations
booked by human agents every day, to verify that the lowest applicable
airfare has been booked.
It is important to understand that this is a highly structured and
logical process that is applied consistently to each reservation; it
does not vary because of any external factors.
Maestro and similar systems are valuable because they apply a
systematic and known process to fare searches that, because of the large
number of possible choices, humans occasionally overlook.
If there were such a thing as "fare simplification," then
logically Maestro’s success at actually finding lower fares (savings
rate) should decrease, reflecting the increased ease with which human
agents can work through the airline price maze and find the "best
fare" without Maestro’s help.
No such positive result was ever realized. Maestro’s savings rate
was not decreased as a result of fare simplification; it is presently
finding approximately 15% more savings opportunities than immediately
before simplification took effect (taking into account all external
factors).
Further, the dollar value of the savings found by Maestro per
reservation dropped appreciably after simplification (the result of
lower fares).
Everyone knows fares are still down, but Maestro’s savings per
reservation are on an upward trend — they are approximately 12% above
where they were in late April
This is most likely is not a result of rising fares, but is instead
further evidence that we continue to be faced with an unfriendly price
environment that is difficult for the best of agents to manage
effectively
How could this be? How can something intended to make things
"simpler" have the opposite effect?
The answer is that few things operate precisely as they are intended.
There are many factors and forces driving the extremely complicated
airline fares and pricing marketplace.
As in any complex system, the "whole" becomes greater than
the "sum of the parts." Because no single entity controls this
marketplace, it is difficult to accurately predict the effects of
single, limited actions (such as theoretically reducing the overall
number of fares) on the "whole" system.
The old adage: "Seek simplicity — then distrust it,"
applies well here. Over time we’ll learn whether or not the
marketplace can rationalize fare simplification into something
productive, but the early results are not encouraging. |