| This piece was substantially ahead of its
time. When it was written ETDN fever was at full strength and
experts routinely predicted that it was the next great technology poised
to change the competitive landscape.
I was among the lone voices taking a contrary view. Read my
retrospective on the ETDN phenomena written several years later, "ETDN Epilogue."
The Electronic Ticket Distribution Network (ETDN), according
to its proponents, promises greatly expanded travel agency distribution
capabilities, low-cost ticket delivery, improved customer service and
protection of travel agency interests.
Significant rewards are to be available in return for limited risks
— such a compelling proposition that the ETDN presentation was among
the best attended at September’s Focus on Automation conference.
Proposed ETDN technology allows any agency having a commercial
relationship with an ETDN supplier to distribute tickets using that
supplier’s ticket distribution network.
The agency prints auditor’s and agent’s copies of a ticket in its
own office, while the flight coupons are electronically separated and
printed at a distant location by the ETDN vendor.
Because the agency uses its own ARC number for all phases of the
transaction (auditor’s, agent’s and fight coupons all carry the same
number just as if they were printed together), overrides and other
production-based incentives are preserved.
The vendor realizes economies of scale because the ticketing needs of
many agencies would be served, with some of this advantage passed to the
agency in lower delivery costs.
Eventually, most ETDN vendors envision large networks comprised of
unattended ticketing devices readily accessible for ticket deliveries to
agency customers.
The experience of banks and automated teller machines (ATMs) is
frequently cited as an example.
First, the bank ATM business model is seriously flawed.
Customers often use bank cash machines because they believe the
experience to be less repellent than dealing with a human teller inside
the branch. I doubt most agencies would find this a compelling
foundation upon which they can build their customer relationships.
Banks created ATM networks using resources that are difficult for any
travel industry vendor to match.
It is conceivable that new ATMs supporting both bank and ticketing
functions could be built, but no one has yet brought a major bank
network operator to the table to say such a proposition would be
technologically or commercially practical.
ATMs also usually occupy a bank’s own physical branch locations. It
is unproven that ticketing facilities can be widely placed in space not
controlled by the ETDN vendor or that this can be done for an acceptable
cost.
Second, where are the customers clamoring for this service?
Admittedly, ETDN services project substantially lower delivery costs,
but most customers would consider it to be a degradation in service if
they have to pick up their tickets from a machine as opposed to having
them delivered.
It is unproven that acceptable customer service standards and
customer satisfaction can be maintained through ETDNs.
Finally, here are a few general risks associated with ETDN
development worth thinking about:
- Financial practicality. Developing ETDNs will be expensive. Those
contemplating using these services should consider whether their
suppliers have sufficient resources.
- Market confusion. There will be a time when several vendors will
compete for ETDN business and locations.
This will doubtless be confusing to travelers and may require that
agents affiliate with multiple networks in order to obtain adequate
coverage.
- Physical space. Prime locations, particularly airports, are
difficult to get. Actual vendor locations in place may fall short of
expectations in quality, quantity, and timing.
- Agent’s role. No matter how supportive ETDN suppliers are of
their agency customers and their marketing needs, the basic concept
of multi-source distribution points means that the agency creating
the ticket is virtually transparent to the client.
It may not be in every agency’s interest to sacrifice geographic
differentiation for delivery expediency.
ETDNs can potentially reduce a fundamental component of an agency’s
costs, but they require further development and actual market experience
to see if this promise is sustainable. |