| Personally, I'm distrustful of most
conspiracy theories. I try to invest time in only the most important
conspiracies of the day, such as "What happened to Princess
Anastasia, what really happened on the grassy knoll and did King Richard
really kill the little princes?"
Reflecting upon these and other notions more current in society will
illustrate that conspiracies are everywhere and have been for hundreds
of years. It seems part of human nature to believe that the evil
whomever is behind strange coincidences and events that appear to
benefit individuals or special groups.
The travel business has plenty of conspiracies. The big one 20 years
ago was that the CRS was a plot so that airlines could make agents do
all their work. That was followed by the evil data conspiracy, wherein
airlines, backoffice suppliers, and just about everyone else was
struggling to get their hands on a travel agent's data so that
unpleasant things could be done with it.
The problem was that few stopped to ask what those unpleasant things
might be or why agents should fear them. Moreover, just a little thought
should have convinced people that most agent's data are in such chaos
that any effort to use it for nefarious purposes would be
disproportionate to the effort. The data conspiracy is still with us
from time to time.
Other travel conspiracies surround electronic ticketing. There have
been discussions on TWX about e-tickets and their impact upon agencies,
but perhaps a bit more space discussing the value and purpose of the
article itself is in order.
People occasionally assert that e-tickets are either useless,
consumer unfriendly or a plot by airlines to enable direct selling and
bypass agents. Again, the conspiracy folks fail to step back and focus
on the issue.
Airline tickets have not changed appreciably in 60 years. It is
downright foolish to maintain an expensive infrastructure built around
issuing little scraps of paper that people are paid to rip, sort, and
shuffle. At it's most ludicrous, travelers arriving at the airport stand
in line and wait while these scraps of paper are diligently written out
so that they can walk a few hundred feet and surrender those same scraps
to employees of the same airline that wrote them out moments before. In
fact, one of the key reasons why people must arrive at the airport an
hour before their flights is so that five different people can stare at
those scraps of paper otherwise called tickets.
Agents spend millions in courier fees, delivery fees, and processing
costs shuffling tickets between themselves and their customers, and
among their various branches. Technology has advanced to the point
where, for many types of travel, tickets no longer serve any purpose.
But doesn't the absence of tickets lessen the agent's value and make
bypass practical? Although I'll answer the question in a moment, I'd
suggest that this question doesn't make any difference. No amount of
wishing for bygone days where e-tickets were only a dream will make it
so. Nor will sorrow over any damage to the agent's role change the costs
and inefficiencies associated with ticketing. The world has moved on and
the travel industry must as well.
This doesn't mean that the confusing and inconvenient thing most
airlines call electronic ticketing is the answer--far from it. Given the
interline, refund, and reliability problems many people (myself
included) avoid e-tickets for some trips. The current process has
successfully traded complex scraps of paper (tickets) for simpler scraps
(boarding passes), but is usually not paperless and has serious
infrastructure problems.
None of that will bring the old days back. It does mean that more
changes are inevitable.
Now to the question about the agent's role: If there is a single
lesson electronic ticketing or electronic booking has to teach it is
that people building businesses around moving scraps of paper are at
risk unless they are adding real (as opposed to perceived or temporary)
value. No conspiracy is needed to understand that lesson. |